<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mountain Lake PBS Productions &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog</link>
	<description>Colin Powers reflects on PBS programming for the Adirondacks, Lake Champlain, &#38; Quebec, public broadcasting, and the future of media distribution.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Hammers the FCC on inconsistent indecency rulings</title>
		<link>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/appeals-court-hammers-fcc-inconsistent-indecency-rulings/:</link>
		<comments>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/appeals-court-hammers-fcc-inconsistent-indecency-rulings/:#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>production</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of public media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content flags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indecency Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicole Ritchie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wardrobe malfunction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision that found the the FCC&#8217;s 2006 decision to punish broadcasters for Cher and Nicole Richie&#8217;s &#8220;fleeting expletives&#8221; was based on vague and inconsistent standards. It is likely that this decision and possibly the upcoming decision on Janet Jackson&#8217;s &#8220;wardrobe malfunction&#8221; in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued <a href="http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Fox-v-FCC-2d-Cir-2010.pdf">a decision </a>that found the the FCC&#8217;s 2006 decision to punish broadcasters for Cher and Nicole Richie&#8217;s &#8220;fleeting expletives&#8221; was based on vague and inconsistent standards. It is likely that this decision and possibly the upcoming decision on Janet Jackson&#8217;s &#8220;wardrobe malfunction&#8221; in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals will be appealed to the Supreme Court for decision in the next several years.</p>
<p>The good news is that this decision included a strongly worded rebuke on the FCC&#8217;s inconsistency regarding rulings about the same expletives that were allowed in Saving Private Ryan, but disallowed in the documentary The Blues – Godfathers and Sons. This might mean a pause in new findings by the FCC while these decisions are appealed. Meanwhile, broadcasters like Mountain Lake PBS are still likely to err on the side of caution and flag and/or censor expletives and visual materials before airing them. Regardless of the court decisions, Mountain Lake PBS will always be careful to evaluate all the programs that we air, provide viewer discretion warnings when appropriate and move questionable content into late evening slots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/appeals-court-hammers-fcc-inconsistent-indecency-rulings/:/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Lost the Big One, Bigtime &#124; Save the Internet</title>
		<link>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/how-i-lost-the-big-one-bigtime-save-the-internet/:</link>
		<comments>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/how-i-lost-the-big-one-bigtime-save-the-internet/:#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>production</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of public media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['net nuetrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/how-i-lost-the-big-one-bigtime-save-the-internet/:</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How I Lost the Big One, Bigtime By Marvin Ammori, April 7, 2010 On Tuesday, the D.C. Circuit ruled on an important Internet law case I argued for Free Press on behalf of a range of “supporting intervenors” in the case. I wanted to post a few thoughts about the decision. I&#8217;ll begin with how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="posterous_autopost">
<div class="posterous_bookmarklet_entry">
<blockquote class="posterous_long_quote">
<div>
<h3 class="title">How I Lost the Big One, Bigtime</h3>
</div>
<div>
<div class="node node-type-blog">
<div class="node-inner">
<p class="submitted">By <a title="View user profile." href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/user/22">Marvin Ammori</a>, April 7, 2010</p>
<div class="content">
<p>On Tuesday, the D.C. Circuit ruled on an important Internet law case I <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/01/appeals-court-warm-to-comcast-in-fight-against-fcc.html">argued</a> for Free Press on behalf of a range of “supporting intervenors” in the case. I wanted to post a few thoughts about the decision.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll begin with how the decision affects you: It&#8217;s really bad news. I&#8217;m sorry to be the one to tell you, but I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard (from multiple news sources). The <a href="http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/201004/08-1291-1238302.pdf">court decision</a> is a stunning, sweeping defeat for the FCC and for its ability to protect consumers, foster competition and innovation, and preserve the Internet&#8217;s role as an engine of free speech and democratic discourse. It means, essentially, that the largest phone and cable companies can secretly block dozens of technologies used by large corporations, <a href="http://getmiro.com/">nonprofits</a> and individuals to speak and organize, and the FCC can do nothing to protect us. (The subject of the <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.pdf">Free Press-Comcast case</a>, which this decision</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="posterous_quote_citation">via <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/10/04/07/how-i-lost-big-one-bigtime">savetheinternet.com</a></div>
<p>I posted the other day about the recent ruling for Comcast and against the FCC. This is straight from one of the attorneys that argued the case.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mlpbsproductions.org/blog/how-i-lost-the-big-one-bigtime-save-the-internet/:/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

